From FSAOF blogg
Migration background
William
Booth said “Brought it all on themselves, you say? Perhaps so, but that
does not excuse our assisting them!” If a person wants to avoid
helping, then by all means, tell me how much cheaper and better it is to
help these refugees close to home. The question and discussion is not
what kind on immigration policy Sweden should have – it is that we have a
problem on our door step. We must help those who need help. Not change
the conversation to Sweden’s immigration policy (thereby avoiding
helping those in front of our noses) how that should be changed. That is
a question for another day, not now!
I
know that there is a question as to whether or not ISIS warriors may be
among those arriving on our shores. I know that Swedes feel they are
getting the short end of the stick. I know there is a raging debate
going on in Swedish society. I know that we have a party that advocates
closing the boarders of Sweden to all new immigration, who even want to
deport those who have been granted a residence permit, to be sent back
to their home countries. I know that this week, starting on October 19,
2015, the Swedish Democratic Party SD (Sverigedemokraterna) are ready to
call for a plebiscite as to whether or not Swedes want to continue the
current immigration policy or not. I know all this, but this does not
affect my view that we are to help those who ask for our help – no
exceptions permitted!
This
is not the first time that Sweden, or for that matter Europe in
general, has accepted refugees. The Swedish Migration Agency records
some of the influx of non-swedes who arrived in Sweden. I think that
most Swedes would agree that these are now to be seen as Swedes. The
list includes citizens from the following countries: Germans (Middle
Ages), Finnish (1500s), Romani (1500s), Wallons (1600s), Savonian people
(1600s), Jews (1700s), French (1700s), Italians (1800s) and Scotch
(1800s). These groups have something in common, that is, they all come
from the countries Europe and share the same religion – Christianity.
They are not Muslims, followers of Islam. This seems to be the unspoken
“real reason” why Swedes oppose accepting those who stand on our
door-step.
Throughout
recorded history, there has always been a migration of peoples. In 376
A.D. the Goths stormed the boarder of the Eastern Roman Empire as they
were pushed out of the land they had lived in by the invading Huns. I
think that one can use the term “refugee” to attach to the Goths. They
were fleeing for their lives, after all!
In
the 50s and 60s Sweden experienced an influx of refugees as well as
workforce immigration. The Swedish Migration Agency states: “It was the
refugees from Germany, the neighbouring Nordic countries and the Baltics
who, over the course of World War II, turned the emigration country
Sweden into an immigration country.” This is what happened after the end
of WWII until the 60s.
My
x times Great Grandfather came to Sweden from what today is Finland. He
came during the 1600s. My parents emigrated from Sweden to the United
States during the 1920s. They were part of that time when Sweden was an
emigration country. I am the child of an immigrant.
During
the 70s Sweden had regulated immigration. The 80s was a decade of
asylum seekers from the new countries, which once had comprised the
county of Yugoslavia. During the 90s we had “ethnic cleansing” that
occurred as a result of the breakup of the former Yugoslavia. This is a
short history of migration of peoples.
The Current Situation in Europe; in particular Sweden.
I am going to use four words, which I think I need to define. The definition I’m going to use the following:
The
term ‘migrant’ corresponds to a generic term for anyone moving to
another country with the intention to stay for a minimum period of time
(i.e. it excludes tourists and business visitors).
'Asylum
seekers' are persons who have formally submitted a request for asylum
but have not yet completed the asylum procedure, i.e. whose request for
asylum is pending.
The
term 'humanitarian migrant' refers to persons who have completed the
asylum procedure with a positive outcome and have been granted some sort
of protection (refugee status or another form of protection) or have
been resettled through programmes outside the asylum procedure.
The term Economic migrant is someone who has left one country for another with the intention to stay.
These are the definitions provided by the OECD in Migration Policy Debate, No. 7, September 2015.
LEONARD JOHNSON
Sweden